Presenting a conceptual framework for identifying and analyzing stakeholders and actors in the Ramzarz ecosystem in cyberspace

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Research Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Security Research Institute, Communication and Information Technology Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

3 Secretary and Senior Researcher, Department of Strategic Management, Cyberspace, Higher National Defense University, Tehran, Iran

4 PhD student, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In recent years, with the growth of cryptocurrencies and their various applications, this issue has become one of the main issues in the field of economics and especially in the financial industry. Due to the growing number of cryptocurrencies in the world, the design of cryptocurrency ecosystems is becoming increasingly important. One of the most important steps in designing this framework is to search, identify, select, and deploy key actors in each of the domains of the blockchain ecosystem. In a cryptocurrency ecosystem, many actors play a role. Some actors play a key role in decision-making, and some work to guide the ecosystem. The present study is an applied research with a qualitative-exploratory approach that has been conducted with the aim of identifying the key actors of Ramzarz with the help of multiple case studies. In this research, and theoretically, a comprehensive framework for identifying the actors and stakeholders of Ramzarz is presented and it is determined who has the power in this ecosystem. This framework can also be a way to identify the main and stakeholders of Ramzarz in the country. The results of this research are in the form of a conceptual framework with eight important dimensions, as actors and stakeholders of the Ramzarz ecosystem with the following titles: infrastructure providers, payment processors, innovators, exchanges, miners, developers, promoters and regulators.

Keywords


  • الف. منابع فارسی

    • پژوهشگاه ارتباطات و فناوری اطلاعات. (1398). سند الزامات رمزارز. پژوهشگاه ارتباطات و فناوری اطلاعات.

     

    ب. منابع انگلیسی

    • A., Cloots, A. S., Hussain, H., Rauchs, M., Saleuddin, R., Allen, J. G., et al Blandin. (2019). Global cryptoasset regulatory landscape study.
    • Alistair Milne & Dmitri Vinogradov Giancarlo Giudici. (2020). Cryptocurrencies: market analysis and perspectives.
    • Arpita Nayak Arpita Nayak. (2017). Blockchain: The perfect data protection tool.
    • Aziz. (2017). ALTCOINS VS. TOKENS: WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE? The Bernie Group.
    • Bahr & Albrecht Chadwick. (1984). Social Science Research Methods.
    • Blockchain Building Blocks: Creating a world of opportunity for insurance from an evolving area of technology. (2017). The American Institute for Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters.
    • Bolton, DiRe Biles. (1989). Herman Hollerith: Inventor, Manager, Entrepreneur—A Centennial Remembrance.
    • cpcu. (2017). Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency. cpcu.
    • Deloitte. (2015). State-Sponsored Cryptocurrency: Adapting the best of Bitcoin’s Innovation to the Payments Ecosystem.
    • Demertzis,Efstathiou Claeys. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and monetary policy.
    • Garrick Hileman & Michel Rauchs. (2017). Global Blockchain Benchmarking Study, Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance.
    • Ghaljaie Naderifar. (2017). Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in QualitativeResearch.
    • H.F Spenkelink. (2014). The Adoption Process of Cryptocurrencies - Identifying factors that influence the adoption of cryptocurrencies from a multiple stakeholder perspective.
    • Hardwin Spenkelink. (2014). Identifying factors that influence the adoption of cryptocurrencies from a multiple stakeholder perspective, Master’s thesis Industrial Engineering and Management (Track: Information Technology and Management) Faculty of Management.
    • https://masterthecrypto.com/differences-between-cryptocurrency-coins-and-tokens/.
    • https://www.bourseiness.com/33846/tokens.
    • I. & Wheeler, S Holloway. (2013). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare.. John Wiley & Sons.
    • K. M Eisenhardt. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review، p: 532-550.
    • Kandaswamy,Lovelock,Reynolds Granetto. (2017). Blockchain Business Value, Worldwide, 2017-2030. Gartner Research.
    • Lawshe CH. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity..
    • Matthew. Matanović, Aleksandar. Leitch. (2018). Control Frameworks for Cryptocurrencies.
    • Michael Gardiner, Michael Lane, Mustafa Ally. (June 2016). "the Potential Impact of Digital Currencies on the Australian Economy".
    • Morphy. (2017). bitcoin-stakeholders. https://www.stakeholdermap.com.
    • Mustafa and Gardiner, Michael and Lane Ally. (2015). "The potential impact of digital currencies on the Australian economy"..
    • R. K Yin. (2014). Case Study Research: design and Methods.. Sage Publication.
    • Rainer, Nicolas Christin, Benjamin Edelman, and Tyler Moore Böhme. (2015). Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance.
    • S. & Guegan, D. (2020). Adhami. (2020). the role of ICO tokens within a well-diversified portfolio..
    • Satoshi Nakamoto. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
    • SNYERS HOUBEN. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and blockchain, Legal context and implications for financial crime, money laundering and tax evasion.
    • Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance this document was requested by the European Parliament''s Special Committee on Financial Crimes. (July 2018). Cryptocurrencies and blockchain, Legal context and implications for financial crime, money laundering and tax evasion.
    • Vergne JP, Wang S. Hsieh YY. (2017). The internal and external governance of blockchain-based organizations.
    • Wang Chun Wei. (2018). Liquidity and market efficiency in cryptocurrencies.