The Strategic Management Process of Iran and Turkey's Security Threats with Emphasis on National Interest

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Graduate Doctor of National Security, Higher National Defense University (Corresponding Author)

2 Assistant Professor of National Intelligence and Security University

3 Head of the Department of National Security, Higher National Defense University

Abstract

The research, which is derived from a doctoral thesis, shows that Iran and Turkey, two neighboring and important Islamic countries in the region, have competing fields at the same time. Many factors and variables are involved in the security rivalries formed between Iran and Turkey and the created security bottleneck that can be attributed to political, economic, cultural and geopolitical factors. Security theories also show that countries in a security dilemma cannot reasonably find solutions to the effects of misunderstandings and mistrust and reduce uncertainty by relying solely on the levels at which they work together. Can reach the management status.
This study seeks to explain the security bottlenecks and dilemmas between the two countries and to foster and enhance the relations and cooperation, while explaining the security bottlenecks and dilemmas between the two countries, a process for strategic management of security bottlenecks between the two countries based on national interests. Offer.
Finally, it was identified that the process should include identifying and explaining the security bottleneck, locating security bottlenecks in the security policy and foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Turkey, and in large part in the security environment of both countries and regions Identifying the points of commonality, differentiation, and key factors in each of the security bottlenecks between Iran and Turkey should be precise about the national interests of the Islamic Republic in the security bottlenecks with Turkey, and determining and identifying management strategies for the security bottlenecks.  

References

  • منابع:

    • بوزان، باری، (1378)، مردم، دولت و هراس، ترجمه پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
    • لک­زایی، نجف، (1389)، ابعاد امنیت در اندیشه و آراء امام خمینی (ره)، فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی شماره 49.
    • عصاریان­نژاد، حسین، (1384)، قرآن و امنیت سیاسی، ماهنامه دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی، شماره 65.
    • ماندل، رابرت، (1377)، چهره متغیر امنیت ملی، ترجمه پژوهشکده راهبردی. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
    • عبداله­خانی، علی، (1389)، نظریه‌های امنیت، تهران: مقدمه‌ای بر طرح‌ریزی دکترین امنیت ملی، مؤسسه فرهنگی مطالعات و تحقیقات بین‌المللی ابرار معاصر.
    • قالیباف، محمدباقر؛ سیدمحمد یعقوبی؛ محمودی، ابوالقاسم، (1393)، تبیین ژئوپلیتیکی سیاست خارجی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در منطقه خلیج‌فارس مبتنی بر انرژی‌های فسیلی، فصلنامه ژئوپلیتیک، سال 10، شماره 3.
    • یزدانی، عنایت‌الله؛ تویسرکانی، مجتبی، مرادی، سوسن، (1386)، تبیین ژئوپلیتیکی رقابت قدرت مطالعه موردی: اوراسیای مرکزی در بازی بزرگ جدید، فصلنامه ژئوپلیتیک، سال 3، شماره 3.
    • حافظ­نیا، محمدرضا؛ شمس دولت‌آبادی، سیدمحمودرضا، (1388)، علایق ژئوپلیتیک و راهبرد ملی، مطالعه موردی: ایران نسبت به آسیای مرکزی، فصلنامه مطالعات دفاعی استراتژیک، سال 10، شماره 36.
    • سیمبر، رضا، (1385)، ژئوپلیتیک و مذهب در نظام بین‌الملل: راهبردها و تحولات، فصلنامه ژئوپلیتیک، سال 2، شماره 3 و 4.
    • Lamb, Robert, Boyden (1984) Competitive strategic management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    • Ehlers, t.m.b & Lazenby K.J.A (2004). Strategic management south Africa concepts and cases. Pretoria: van schik.
    • Samuel C. Certo J Paul Peter. (1990), Strategic Management A focus on process, Singapore.
    • Hertz, John (1990). “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma”, World politics, Vol.2, No.2
    • Duffield, Mark (2010). The Global Life-Chance Divide. Security Dialogue vol. 41, no. 1, February
    • Stockton, Nicholas (1998). ‘In Defence of Humanitarianism’, Disasters 22(4): 352–360.
    • Macrae, Joanna & Nicholas Leader (2000). ‘Shifting Sands: The Search for “Coherence” Between Political and Humanitarian Responses to Complex Emergencies’, Humanitarian Policy Group Report 8. London: Overseas Development Institute.
    • Fox, Fionna (1999). ‘The Politicisation of Humanitarian Aid: A Discussion Paper for Caritas Europa – November (1999). London: CAFOD.
    • Sida, Lewis (2005). Challenges to Humanitarian Space: A Review of Humanitarian Issues Related to the UN Integrated Mission in Liberia and to the Relationship Between Humanitarian and Military Actors in Liberia. Liberia: Monitoring and Steering Group.
    • Bradbury, Mark (1998). ‘Normalising the Crisis in Africa’, Disasters 22(4): 328–338.
    • Hynek, Nik and D. Chandler (2013). No emancipatory alternative, no critical security studies, Critical Studies on Security, Vol. 1, No. 1
    • Jervis, Robert (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World politics. Volume 30. Issue 2.
    • Buzan, Barry and Waver, Ole (2003) Regions and Powers The Structure of International Security, New York: Cambridge University Press
National Security
Volume 9, Issue 33 - Serial Number 33
December 2019
Pages 195-220

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 July 2018
  • Revise Date: 15 February 2020
  • Accept Date: 02 March 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics